Sunday, December 26, 2004

Caroline Glick does not a spokesperson make...

Caroline Glick in this week's Column One makes two stupid mistakes. One she "justifies" the settlers' right to wear orange stars, even though it offends the sensibilities of most Jews around the world, with the following paragraph;


Gaza residents caused a public outcry when they taped orange Stars of David to their clothes this week. The hue and cry of the politicians on the Right and on the Left said that in using symbols from the Holocaust they were besmirching the memory of the victims of Europe's genocide of its Jews. It would seem that those who decried the residents' symbol have forgotten what a metaphor is. The point was not that Sharon is Adolf Hitler or that Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz is Adolf Eichmann. The point of the protest was that Israel is the first Western state to call for the forced removal of Jews from their homes, simply because they are Jews, since the Holocaust and that there is something morally atrocious about the notion that for peace to come –- to Israel and to those bombing Israel –- it is necessary for entire regions to be rendered Judenrein. And again, as leaders in Israel and throughout the world have stated, the expulsion from Gaza and northern Samaria is simply a preview of coming attractions for what awaits those who live in Judea and the rest of Samaria.

Caroline Glick - this is NOT a metaphor - it is an offensive statement. Jews were not just "forced" out of their homes in the holocaust. They were not given financial compensation to set up their homes elsewhere. They were systematically and brutally murdered by Jew hating Nazis. This is not something I would wish on even some of the most radical settlers!

Your second mistake dear Caroline, is to call the removal of settlers from Gaza "ethnic cleansing". Metaphor or not - I think you need to re-evaluate what the terms holocaust and ethnic cleansing mean. There would be nothing to discuss if the Janjaweed in Sudan had afforded the masses the same courtesies that Sharon is offering the settlers in the disengagement plan.
The moral dimension of the proposed destruction of Israeli communities in Gaza and northern Samaria is one that has received scant attention over the past year since Sharon adopted the Labor Party's plan of retreat and expulsion as his own. Indeed, although it was one of the implicit assumptions of the 1993 Oslo process, the fact that a precondition for a final peace accord with the PLO was that all Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria and Gaza would be ethnically cleansed has rarely been mentioned. As for Sharon's withdrawal plan for Gaza and northern Samaria, everyone from US National Security Council Middle East Adviser Elliott Abrams to Labor Party leader Shimon Peres to Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak to British Prime Minister Tony Blair have all noted that the plan, if enacted, will provide a precedent for the destruction of all or most of the remaining Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria with their population of some 250,000 Israelis.
ethnic cleansing
n : the mass expulsion and killing of one ethic or religious group in an area by another ethnic or religious group in that area